"In politics we learn the most from those who disagree with us..."

"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest; but the myth--persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - John F. Kennedy




Purple Nation? What's that? Good question.

Neither Red nor Blue. In other words, not knee-jerk liberal Democrat or jerk Republican. But certainly not some foggy third way either.

In recent years partisan politics in America has become superimposed on cultural identity and life style choices. You know - whether you go to church or not, or whether you drive a Volvo or a pickup, or where you live. This promotes a false political consciousness that we hope to remedy here.

There are both myths and truths to this Red-Blue dichotomy and we'd like to distinguish between the two. So, please, read on, join the discussion, contribute your point of view.

Diversity of opinion is encouraged...

Monday, September 8, 2008

Can Obama Govern?

The Obama phenomenon seems tough to pin down. Shelby Steele does a pretty good job in his book A Bound Man. I recommend the book for a more thorough reading, but in a nutshell Steele argues that Obama is bound by the bargains he's made to get to heights he's climbed in American politics.

He's implicitly promised the black community that he will not betray their social and political agenda in return for their votes. To date he has chosen to work within the narrow confines of traditional post-60s liberal politics. Steele argues that Obama wears this mask to reassure his black support.

At the same time, to attract mainstream majority support from whites, Obama has made the bargain not to challenge whites on racist grounds. White supporters in return retain the innocence of racial fairness. By bargaining with whites, Obama raises suspicion among blacks (witness Jesse Jackson's bitter outburst). But pandering to black challengers like Jackson and Jeremiah Wright risks scaring off white supporters. This is Obama's personal bind.

My own question refers to his governing bind. As I've discussed previously, polls show American voters see themselves slightly to the right of center on political ideology. This means no big government programs to solve their personal problems. They also perceive Obama and Clinton far to the left and Bush off to the right. John McCain comes closest to how they view themselves. Let us first assume that this is not Obama's true position, that it's mostly a reflection of primary politics. This is a generous assumption given Obama's legilative record to date.

Let us also assume Obama is able, purely by force of personality and charisma, to win the presidency. Surely the Democrats will retain a large majority in the Congress and perhaps even a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. How will Obama tack to the center on policy given liberal control in both houses of Congress? After also having bound himself to the liberal demands of the minority community?

Is seems virtually impossible for Obama to govern a center-right polity from the position he's anchored himself. He will have to take his marching orders from the liberal wing of the legislature or risk getting bogged down in intraparty rivalries. Think of the first two years of the Clinton candidacy but without a grace period. Liberals will claim the country really is not center-right, but given the evidence that appears to be mostly wishful thinking.

No comments: